Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 196: 105972, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32512407

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Establishing an overall survival prognosis for resected glioblastoma during routine postoperative management remains a challenge. The aim of our single-center study was to assess the usefulness of basing survival analyses on preradiotherapy MRI (PRMR) rather than on postoperative MRI (POMR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 75 patients with glioblastoma treated at our institute. We collected overall survival and MRI volumetric data. We analyzed two types of volumetric data: residual tumor volume and extent of resection. Overall survival rates were compared according to these two types of volumetric data, calculated on either POMR or PRMR and according to the presence or absence of residual enhancement. RESULTS: Analysis of volumetric data revealed progression of some residual tumors between POMR and PRMR. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlations between extent of resection, residual tumor volume, and overall survival revealed significant differences between POMR and PRMR data. Both MRI scans indicated a difference between the complete resection subgroup and the incomplete resection subgroup, as median overall survival was longer in patients with complete resection. However, differences were significant for PRMR (25.3 vs. 15.5, p =  0.012), but not for POMR (21.3 vs. 15.8 months, p =  0.145). With a residual tumor volume cut-off value of 3 cm3, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed non-significant differences on POMR (p =  0.323) compared with PRMR (p =  0.007). CONCLUSION: Survival in patients with resected glioblastoma was more accurately predicted by volumetric data acquired with PRMR. Differences in predicted survival between the POMR and PRMR groups can be attributed to changes in tumor behavior before adjuvant therapy.


Assuntos
Irradiação Craniana , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neuroimagem , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Neoplasias Supratentoriais/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasia Residual , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Supratentoriais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Supratentoriais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Supratentoriais/terapia , Carga Tumoral
3.
J Neurooncol ; 142(3): 489-497, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30783874

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Systematic pre-radiotherapy MRI in patients with newly resected glioblastoma (OMS 2016) sometimes reveals tumor growth in the period between surgery and radiotherapy. We evaluated the relation between early tumor growth and overall survival (OS) with the aim of finding predictors of regrowth. METHODS: Seventy-five patients from 25 to 84 years old (Median age 62 years) with preoperative, immediate postoperative, and preradiotherapy MRI were included. Volumetric measurements were made on each of the three MRI scans and clinical and molecular parameters were collected for each case. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (72%) had an early regrowth with a median contrast enhancement volume of 3.61 cm3-range 0.12-71.93 cm3. The median OS was 24 months in patients with no early tumor growth and 17.1 months in those with early tumor regrowth (p = 0.0024). In the population with initial complete resection (27 patients), the median OS was 25.3 months (19 patients) in those with no early tumor growth between surgery and radiotherapy compared to 16.3 months (8 patients) in those with tumor regrowth. In multivariate analysis, the initial extent of resection (p < 0.001) and the delay between postoperative MRI and preradiotherapy MRI (p < 0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors of regrowth and of poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that, in addition to the well known issue of incomplete resection, longer delays between surgery and adjuvant treatment is an independent factors of tumor regrowth and a risk factor of poorer outcomes for the patients. To overcome the delay factor, we suggest shortening the usual time between surgery and radiotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/mortalidade , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...